Command Palette
Search for a command to run...
Adapting Neural Link Predictors for Data-Efficient Complex Query Answering
Erik Arakelyan; Pasquale Minervini; Daniel Daza; Michael Cochez; Isabelle Augenstein

Abstract
Answering complex queries on incomplete knowledge graphs is a challenging task where a model needs to answer complex logical queries in the presence of missing knowledge. Prior work in the literature has proposed to address this problem by designing architectures trained end-to-end for the complex query answering task with a reasoning process that is hard to interpret while requiring data and resource-intensive training. Other lines of research have proposed re-using simple neural link predictors to answer complex queries, reducing the amount of training data by orders of magnitude while providing interpretable answers. The neural link predictor used in such approaches is not explicitly optimised for the complex query answering task, implying that its scores are not calibrated to interact together. We propose to address these problems via CQD$^{\mathcal{A}}$, a parameter-efficient score \emph{adaptation} model optimised to re-calibrate neural link prediction scores for the complex query answering task. While the neural link predictor is frozen, the adaptation component -- which only increases the number of model parameters by $0.03\%$ -- is trained on the downstream complex query answering task. Furthermore, the calibration component enables us to support reasoning over queries that include atomic negations, which was previously impossible with link predictors. In our experiments, CQD$^{\mathcal{A}}$ produces significantly more accurate results than current state-of-the-art methods, improving from $34.4$ to $35.1$ Mean Reciprocal Rank values averaged across all datasets and query types while using $\leq 30\%$ of the available training query types. We further show that CQD$^{\mathcal{A}}$ is data-efficient, achieving competitive results with only $1\%$ of the training complex queries, and robust in out-of-domain evaluations.
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Methodology | Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| complex-query-answering-on-fb15k | CQDA | MRR 1p: 0.892 MRR 2i: 0.761 MRR 2p: 0.645 MRR 2u: 0.684 MRR 3i: 0.794 MRR 3p: 0.579 MRR ip: 0.706 MRR pi: 0.701 MRR up: 0.579 |
| complex-query-answering-on-fb15k-237 | CQDA | MRR 1p: 0.467 MRR 2i: 0.345 MRR 2p: 0.136 MRR 2u: 0.176 MRR 3i: 0.483 MRR 3p: 0.114 MRR ip: 0.209 MRR pi: 0.274 MRR up: 0.114 |
| complex-query-answering-on-nell-995 | CQDA | MRR 1p: 0.604 MRR 2i: 0.434 MRR 2p: 0.229 MRR 2u: 0.200 MRR 3i: 0.526 MRR 3p: 0.167 MRR ip: 0.264 MRR pi: 0.321 MRR up: 0.170 |
Build AI with AI
From idea to launch — accelerate your AI development with free AI co-coding, out-of-the-box environment and best price of GPUs.