Command Palette
Search for a command to run...
{ Seungyong Lee Sunghyun Cho Sungkil Lee Junyong Lee}

Abstract
In this paper, we propose the first end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, Defocus Map Estimation Network (DMENet), for spatially varying defocus map estimation. To train the network, we produce a novel depth-of-field (DOF) dataset, SYNDOF, where each image is synthetically blurred with a ground-truth depth map. Due to the synthetic nature of SYNDOF, the feature characteristics of images in SYNDOF can differ from those of real defocused photos. To address this gap, we use domain adaptation that transfers the features of real defocused photos into those of synthetically blurred ones. Our DMENet consists of four subnetworks: blur estimation, domain adaptation, content preservation, and sharpness calibration networks. The subnetworks are connected to each other and jointly trained with their corresponding supervisions in an end-to-end manner. Our method is evaluated on publicly available blur detection and blur estimation datasets and the results show the state-of-the-art performance.In this paper, we propose the first end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, Defocus Map Estimation Network (DMENet), for spatially varying defocus map estimation. To train the network, we produce a novel depth-of-field (DOF) dataset, SYNDOF, where each image is synthetically blurred with a ground-truth depth map. Due to the synthetic nature of SYNDOF, the feature characteristics of images in SYNDOF can differ from those of real defocused photos. To address this gap, we use domain adaptation that transfers the features of real defocused photos into those of synthetically blurred ones. Our DMENet consists of four subnetworks: blur estimation, domain adaptation, content preservation, and sharpness calibration networks. The subnetworks are connected to each other and jointly trained with their corresponding supervisions in an end-to-end manner. Our method is evaluated on publicly available blur detection and blur estimation datasets and the results show the state-of-the-art performance.
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Methodology | Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| defocus-estimation-on-cuhk-blur-detection | DMENet (BDCS) | Blur Segmentation Accuracy: 87.35 |
Build AI with AI
From idea to launch — accelerate your AI development with free AI co-coding, out-of-the-box environment and best price of GPUs.