HyperAI
HyperAI
Home
News
Latest Papers
Tutorials
Datasets
Wiki
SOTA
LLM Models
GPU Leaderboard
Events
Search
About
English
HyperAI
HyperAI
Toggle sidebar
Search the site…
⌘
K
Home
SOTA
Anomaly Detection
Anomaly Detection On Unlabeled Cifar 10 Vs
Anomaly Detection On Unlabeled Cifar 10 Vs
Metrics
AUROC
Results
Performance results of various models on this benchmark
Columns
Model Name
AUROC
Paper Title
Repository
Input Complexity (PixelCNN++)
53.5
Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative models
-
SSD
89.6
SSD: A Unified Framework for Self-Supervised Outlier Detection
-
MeanShifted
90.0
Mean-Shifted Contrastive Loss for Anomaly Detection
-
Likelihood (Glow)
58.2
Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative models
-
PsudoLabels ResNet-18
90.8
Out-of-Distribution Detection Without Class Labels
-
CSI
89.3
CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instances
-
PsudoLabels ViT
96.7
Out-of-Distribution Detection Without Class Labels
-
PsudoLabels ResNet-152
93.3
Out-of-Distribution Detection Without Class Labels
-
Likelihood (PixelCNN++)
52.6
Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative models
-
SCAN Features
90.2
Out-of-Distribution Detection Without Class Labels
-
Input Complexity (Glow)
73.6
Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative models
-
GOAD
89.2
Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Data
-
MTL
82.92
Shifting Transformation Learning for Out-of-Distribution Detection
-
0 of 13 row(s) selected.
Previous
Next
Anomaly Detection On Unlabeled Cifar 10 Vs | SOTA | HyperAI