HyperAIHyperAI

Image Retrieval On Rparis Hard

Metrics

mAP

Results

Performance results of various models on this benchmark

Model Name
mAP
Paper TitleRepository
R–GeM56.3 Fine-tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotation-
FIRe70.0Learning Super-Features for Image Retrieval-
HOW62.4Learning and aggregating deep local descriptors for instance-level recognition-
HesAff–rSIFT–VLAD 17.5 Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarking-
Token78.56Learning Token-based Representation for Image Retrieval-
DELG+ α QE reranking + RRT reranking77.7Instance-level Image Retrieval using Reranking Transformers-
HesAff–rSIFT–HQE44.7Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarking-
Hypergraph propagation83.3Hypergraph Propagation and Community Selection for Objects Retrieval
Dino51.6Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers-
DELF–ASMK*+SP55.4 Large-Scale Image Retrieval with Attentive Deep Local Features-
HesAff–rSIFT–SMK*+SP31.3 Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarking-
R – [O] –SPoC44.7Aggregating Local Deep Features for Image Retrieval-
HesAff–rSIFT–SMK*31.2 Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarking-
SuperGlobal86.7Global Features are All You Need for Image Retrieval and Reranking-
R – [O] –CroW 47.2Cross-dimensional Weighting for Aggregated Deep Convolutional Features-
R–R-MAC59.4 Particular object retrieval with integral max-pooling of CNN activations-
DELF–HQE+SP69.3Large-Scale Image Retrieval with Attentive Deep Local Features-
HesAff–rSIFT–ASMK*34.5Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarking-
HesAff–rSIFT–ASMK*+SP35.0Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarking-
R – [O] –MAC44.1Particular object retrieval with integral max-pooling of CNN activations-
0 of 23 row(s) selected.
Image Retrieval On Rparis Hard | SOTA | HyperAI