Home News Latest Papers Tutorials Datasets Wiki SOTA LLM Models GPU Leaderboard Events

English

Sentiment Analysis On Dynasent

Metrics

Macro F1

Results

Performance results of various models on this benchmark

Model Name	Macro F1	Paper Title	Repository
GPT-4o + ELECTRA Large FT (Prompt, Label, Examples)	81.53	ELECTRA and GPT-4o: Cost-Effective Partners for Sentiment Analysis	-
ELECTRA Large Fine-Tuned	76.29	ELECTRA and GPT-4o: Cost-Effective Partners for Sentiment Analysis	-
GPT-4o-mini + ELECTRA Large FT (Prompt, Label)	77.94	ELECTRA and GPT-4o: Cost-Effective Partners for Sentiment Analysis	-
GPT-4o + ELECTRA Large FT	77.69	ELECTRA and GPT-4o: Cost-Effective Partners for Sentiment Analysis	-
ELECTRA Base Fine-Tuned	71.83	ELECTRA and GPT-4o: Cost-Effective Partners for Sentiment Analysis	-
SVM	-	Arabic Multi-Dialect Segmentation: bi-LSTM-CRF vs. SVM	-
GPT-4o Fine-Tuned (Minimal)	89	ELECTRA and GPT-4o: Cost-Effective Partners for Sentiment Analysis	-
GPT-4o-mini + ELECTRA Large FT (Prompt, Label, Probabilities)	79.72	ELECTRA and GPT-4o: Cost-Effective Partners for Sentiment Analysis	-
GPT-4o-mini + ELECTRA Base FT	76.19	ELECTRA and GPT-4o: Cost-Effective Partners for Sentiment Analysis	-
GPT-4o-mini Fine-Tuned	86.9	ELECTRA and GPT-4o: Cost-Effective Partners for Sentiment Analysis	-
GPT-4o (Prompt)	80.22	ELECTRA and GPT-4o: Cost-Effective Partners for Sentiment Analysis	-
GPT-4o-mini (Prompt)	77.35	ELECTRA and GPT-4o: Cost-Effective Partners for Sentiment Analysis	-

0 of 12 row(s) selected.

Sentiment Analysis On Dynasent | SOTA | HyperAI